(Source: mrowmix)

thisisntfarmlife:

theshadowofyoursong:

strangewood:

The Films of Jim Jarmusch

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again - Polish posters for Jarmusch films are the most aesthetically pleasing thing in the world.

I’ve only seen four of these movies, but one of my personal movie-watching resolutions was to get even more into Jarmusch’s work this year.

So, so, so beautiful. Also, Broken Flowers. BROKEN FLOWERS.

stonerparty:

tepidsloth

stop it kiity

Beck - Debra
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]
190 playsDownload
Debra - Beck from Midnite Vultures

stankubrick:

Debra - Beck

i cold step to you

im gonna BURN THE FUCK outta your mouf

(Source: )

cassietackett:

Me, waiting for my pizza rolls.

cassietackett:

Me, waiting for my pizza rolls.

friendlyatheist:

emergingtechblogger:

Religion can be bad. Science can be bad.The point here is…. both things, at their extreme can be very bad. Morality motivates humans, either in the context of science, or the context of religion, to do good or bad.

What a dumb comparison. It was not science that motivated the Nazis to send V-2 rockets. It was a political ideology mixed with a personality cult directed at Hitler. In other words, the Nazis had more in common with religion than with science. Science is a process we used to discover what is true about the universe. How science is used is another matter. It is asinine to ascribe intention to science when it cant have any to begin with. Is like saying that calculus, trigonometry or fractions can be bad. It makes no sense.
With religion we can’t say the same thing. Religious beliefs informs peoples actions. When the 911 hijackers said “Allahu Akbhar” they said it for a reason.
Sam Harris said it best:
“People of faith often claim that the crimes of Hitler, Stalin, Mao and  Pol Pot were the inevitable product of unbelief. The problem with  fascism and communism, however, is not that they are too critical of  religion; the problem is that they are too much like religions. Such  regimes are dogmatic to the core and generally give rise to personality  cults that are indistinguishable from cults of religious hero worship.  Auschwitz, the gulag and the killing fields were not examples of what  happens when human beings reject religious dogma; they are examples of  political, racial and nationalistic dogma run amok. There is no society  in human history that ever suffered because its people became too  reasonable.”
-FA

friendlyatheist:

emergingtechblogger:

Religion can be bad. Science can be bad.

The point here is…. both things, at their extreme can be very bad. Morality motivates humans, either in the context of science, or the context of religion, to do good or bad.

What a dumb comparison. It was not science that motivated the Nazis to send V-2 rockets. It was a political ideology mixed with a personality cult directed at Hitler. In other words, the Nazis had more in common with religion than with science. Science is a process we used to discover what is true about the universe. How science is used is another matter. It is asinine to ascribe intention to science when it cant have any to begin with. Is like saying that calculus, trigonometry or fractions can be bad. It makes no sense.

With religion we can’t say the same thing. Religious beliefs informs peoples actions. When the 911 hijackers said “Allahu Akbhar” they said it for a reason.

Sam Harris said it best:

“People of faith often claim that the crimes of Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot were the inevitable product of unbelief. The problem with fascism and communism, however, is not that they are too critical of religion; the problem is that they are too much like religions. Such regimes are dogmatic to the core and generally give rise to personality cults that are indistinguishable from cults of religious hero worship. Auschwitz, the gulag and the killing fields were not examples of what happens when human beings reject religious dogma; they are examples of political, racial and nationalistic dogma run amok. There is no society in human history that ever suffered because its people became too reasonable.”

-FA

(Source: politics-war)

noise-n-tangerines:

I have watched this over and over for quite some time now. Never not funny. 

noise-n-tangerines:

I have watched this over and over for quite some time now. Never not funny. 

(Source: finalellipsis)


On June 11th 1963, Thích Quảng Đức, a Vietnamese Buddhist monk, sat   down in the middle of a busy intersection in Saigon, covered himself in   gasoline and He then ignited a match, and set himself on fire. Đức   burned to death in a matter of minutes, and he was immortalized in a   famous photograph taken by a reporter who was in Vietnam in order to   photograph the war. All those who saw this spectacle were taken by the   fact that Duc did not make a sound while burning to death. Đức was   protesting President Ngô Đình Diệm’s administration for oppressing the   Buddhist religion.

On June 11th 1963, Thích Quảng Đức, a Vietnamese Buddhist monk, sat down in the middle of a busy intersection in Saigon, covered himself in gasoline and He then ignited a match, and set himself on fire. Đức burned to death in a matter of minutes, and he was immortalized in a famous photograph taken by a reporter who was in Vietnam in order to photograph the war. All those who saw this spectacle were taken by the fact that Duc did not make a sound while burning to death. Đức was protesting President Ngô Đình Diệm’s administration for oppressing the Buddhist religion.

(Source: ramirezdahmerbundy)

Apparently, Obama has already signed ACTA. Possibly illegally.

You can read more about it here.
If you live in the United States, PLEASE sign this petition to get ACTA reviewed by the Senate.
Otherwise, keep spreading the word about ACTA!

Yes please signal boost this, this is more important than the other petition going around!  Obama has already signed ACTA so we need to get it to the Senate and then make sure they don’t approve it.

(Source: trainerkelly)

There’s no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy.

The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.